Wednesday, June 25, 2003

More NY Times Hijinks
Richard Johnson's Page Six column in the NY Post reports Unburied Hatchets at Times:
THE back-stabbing at the New York Times didn't end with the firing of plagiarizing reporter Jayson Blair and the "resignations" of executive editor Howell Raines and managing editor Gerald Boyd.
The latest dirty trick is an anonymous letter to PAGE SIX which claims a petition is being circulated "to remind [publisher] Arthur Sulzberger Jr. that several editors who remain on West 43rd Street were enthusiastic henchmen of the Raines era and would be unacceptable in a new editing team."

The only "enthusiastic henchman" named, however, is Andrew Rosenthal, the assistant managing editor and son of former Times executive editor Abe Rosenthal. The supposed petition urges Sulzberger to "either demote or preferably dismiss Andy, who is as responsible as Howell and Gerald for our current plight."

"Arthur, if Andy remains in place, you will never be rid of the poison in the atmosphere here," it continues. "For many of us, Andy was the poison, since Howell and Gerald mostly hid themselves away from the newsroom staff and Andy was their public face. Andy treats colleagues with contempt. His editing is both capricious and dishonest . . . He was Howell's lapdog."

A Times spokeswoman told us: "We have neither seen nor heard of a petition and would be shocked if it were true, because Andy Rosenthal is a talented journalist with a bright future at the New York Times."
Yeah, right.
Rosenthal made a name for himself covering the 1992 election with a front-page story asserting that President Bush (the elder) was so out of touch with the everyday world that he'd never seen a supermarket bar-code scanner. In fact, the president had examined a state-of-the-art prototype on display at a National Grocers Assn. convention.
...
The White House demanded a correction. It didn't get one, but it did get an apology from Times chairman Arthur Sulzberger Sr., who admitted Rosenthal's story was "just a teeny-weeny bit naughty."
The little pissant is getting much less than he deserves.